Topics include, but are not limited to: synthetic and systems biology, urban planning and economics, politics, craft beer, and bicycles. Caveat lector.

 

It’s like deja-vu all over again

fleetfootedfox:

ericmortensen:

rainblog:

Remember the Google Buzz fiasco? In their eagerness to roll out their latest whizz-bang new killer feature (by the way, does anyone still use Buzz?), Google didn’t bother to think about - or deliberately chose to ignore - the potential privacy implications of their model and ended up exposing everyone’s contacts. A predictable outcry followed, and Google was forced to walk it all back and put in the protections that should have been in there from the start.

But that’s all in the past now, and Google have learned their lesson, haven’t they? Well, no. Because now they’ve launched Google Social Search, another exciting innovation we didn’t need that … leaks all your contact information all over again.

How does it do that? If you’re logged in when you search for something, Google will show results that are somehow related to your ‘social circle’. Google assembles your social circle by the usual connectivity voodoo - digging through your Gmail contacts, your Google reader subscriptions and so forth. So far, there’s no great cause for alarm. But Google also includes second-order contacts - friends of your friends - in the results. And that’s where the trouble starts.

To illustrate the problem, suppose you are a married man who has been secretly carrying on with the local femme fatale. Your wife does a search for that charming little restaurant where you celebrate your wedding anniversary, and uncovers a glowing review written by that shameless hussy, accompanied by a helpful note from Google explaining that she shows up in the results because she’s a friend of yours. Marital ructions ensue.

Or you’re considering leaving your job at WidgetCo and have been sending out copies of your resume. When your boss searches for something, his social search results suddenly include half a dozen recruiters and the CEO of rival GadgetCorp, all tagged as contacts of yours. Problematic, no?

The possible scenarios go on and on. Subscribe to a mailing list for wombat fetishists? One lucky search hit and the whole world can know about your fondness for those winsome marsupials. And so on. And so on.

Friend-of-a-friend (FOAF) leaks are one of those nasty social networking gotchas that most users don’t think about. Apparently Google didn’t think about this one either because - even after the Buzz mess - they went ahead and engineered it straight into their new baby. What they didn’t do, of course, is provide any way for you to opt-out. There’s no mechanism for saying “No, dammit, don’t expose my list of private contacts to all my friends.” And unlike Buzz, which at least you had to start using before it could out all your contacts, Google Social Search will go ahead and expose your friends without you lifting a finger. I guess they call that progress.

So here we go again. Once again, we need to make a noise and get Google to undo their latest piece of thoughtlessness before it starts messing up people’s lives.

I’d been seeing people’s google-reader-shared items in search, but this is a whole ‘nother level.

Oh for fuck’s sake, they really can’t just leave well enough alone. 

Played 80 times
[Flash 9 is required to listen to audio.]

Wolf Parade - what did my lover say? (it always had to go this way)

emptyage:

Now I’m enraged! Biggest isn’t best!
bstriddy:

Sorry, but this chart is a nonsense. If you read the fine print, you’ll find that the ranking is by sales volume. I’m not sure what exactly qualifies a brewer as craft, but I feel quite certain that sales volume is typically contraindicative of craft. (I do mean typically, not necessarily.)
Checking the Bay Area and seeing Gordon Biersch is what tipped me off that this is bogus. No Russian River, no Bear Republic?! Michigan at least has Bells, but what about Jolly Pumpkin and Leelanau? I call PSHAW.
ilovecharts:

mocus:

50 Best Craft Brewers in America
A much needed Map!
http://www.francescamclin.com/blog/50-best-craft-brewers-in-america/




Jesus, no, we certainly wouldn’t want any of these brewers to be successful and have the resources to make even more great beers.

Also, you might find this bit from the original source helpful:

The definition of a craft brewer, according to the Brewers Association, is as follows,An American craft brewer is small, independent, and traditional.Small: Annual production of beer less than 2 million barrels. Beer production is attributed to a brewer according to the rules of alternating proprietorships. Flavored malt beverages are not considered beer for purposes of this definition.Independent: Less than 25% of the craft brewery is owned or controlled (or equivalent economic interest) by an alcoholic beverage industry member who is not themselves a craft brewer.Traditional: A brewer who has either an all malt flagship (the beer which represents the greatest volume among that brewers brands) or has at least 50% of it’s volume in either all malt beers or in beers which use adjuncts to enhance rather than lighten flavor

emptyage:

Now I’m enraged! Biggest isn’t best!

bstriddy:

Sorry, but this chart is a nonsense. If you read the fine print, you’ll find that the ranking is by sales volume. I’m not sure what exactly qualifies a brewer as craft, but I feel quite certain that sales volume is typically contraindicative of craft. (I do mean typically, not necessarily.)

Checking the Bay Area and seeing Gordon Biersch is what tipped me off that this is bogus. No Russian River, no Bear Republic?! Michigan at least has Bells, but what about Jolly Pumpkin and Leelanau? I call PSHAW.

ilovecharts:

mocus:

50 Best Craft Brewers in America

A much needed Map!

http://www.francescamclin.com/blog/50-best-craft-brewers-in-america/

Jesus, no, we certainly wouldn’t want any of these brewers to be successful and have the resources to make even more great beers.

Also, you might find this bit from the original source helpful:

The definition of a craft brewer, according to the Brewers Association, is as follows,

An American craft brewer is small, independent, and traditional.

Small: Annual production of beer less than 2 million barrels. Beer production is attributed to a brewer according to the rules of alternating proprietorships. Flavored malt beverages are not considered beer for purposes of this definition.

Independent: Less than 25% of the craft brewery is owned or controlled (or equivalent economic interest) by an alcoholic beverage industry member who is not themselves a craft brewer.

Traditional: A brewer who has either an all malt flagship (the beer which represents the greatest volume among that brewers brands) or has at least 50% of it’s volume in either all malt beers or in beers which use adjuncts to enhance rather than lighten flavor

Danny Westneat | 'Self-made' myth divides us | Seattle Times Newspaper

Of all stories we tell ourselves, the one about how we’re a merit-based nation of lone wolves has got to be the most enduring. The most intoxicating. And the most baloney.

Nowhere is the myth as confused with reality as in rock-ribbed Eastern Washington. The place depends utterly on the government and communal resources for its existence, from the New Deal irrigation system still being paid for by taxpayers elsewhere, to farming subsidies and crop price supports. Yet in their own minds, they are mavericks living off the land.

Played 13 times
[Flash 9 is required to listen to audio.]

The National - Anyone’s Ghost

You said it was not inside my heart, it was

You said it should tear a kid apart, it does

Played 12 times
[Flash 9 is required to listen to audio.]

Spoon - Black Like Me

Played 17 times
[Flash 9 is required to listen to audio.]

Sleigh Bells - Run the Heart

“Progress Parade: Oil,” an American Petroleum Institute video from 1960:

“The results were in: the test oysters showed no ill effects from oil. As a matter of fact, the test oysters loved it so much, they brought forth a new generation to share their luck. They never had it so good!”

I don’t think Osama bin Laden sent those planes to attack us because he hated our freedom. I think he did it because of our support for Israel, our ties with the Saudi family and our military bases in Saudi Arabia. You know why I think that? Because that’s what he fucking said! Are we a nation of 6-year-olds? Answer: yes.

evangotlib:

thedailywhat:

This Looks Shopped of the Day: Meanwhile, in the not too distant future, at the  BP oil spill command center.
(context.)
[randompictures.]

YES!

evangotlib:

thedailywhat:

This Looks Shopped of the Day: Meanwhile, in the not too distant future, at the BP oil spill command center.

(context.)

[randompictures.]

YES!

ericmortensen:

Sonja Sohn, best known as Detective Kima Greggs on The Wire, is now the founder and CEO of the Baltimore-based reWIRED for Change, an outreach program intended to communicate with (and ultimately rehabilitate) at-risk young people who have been involved in criminal activity. The program is run out of the University of Maryland School of Social Work and uses episodes of The Wire as a teaching tool, encouraging the participants to examine and query their own lives and past actions. Various other actors and writers involved with The Wire also serve as board members.
\via Wikipedia

ericmortensen:

Sonja Sohn, best known as Detective Kima Greggs on The Wire, is now the founder and CEO of the Baltimore-based reWIRED for Change, an outreach program intended to communicate with (and ultimately rehabilitate) at-risk young people who have been involved in criminal activity. The program is run out of the University of Maryland School of Social Work and uses episodes of The Wire as a teaching tool, encouraging the participants to examine and query their own lives and past actions. Various other actors and writers involved with The Wire also serve as board members.

\via Wikipedia